Saturday, 12 November 2011

Neo No More

The force that supplanted Christian Democracy in Italy is no more. After the time-honoured manner of the British Conservative Party, it was the vehicle whereby the local machines of traditionalist, religious, agrarian and related politics were taken over by committed Liberals and their voters told that they had nowhere else to go. Those Liberals were of the fiercely secular, "free"-marketeering type normal on the Continent and exemplified in Britain by Nick Clegg, and were therefore, as the heirs to the unification of Italy, closely allied to the overtly Fascist National Alliance, Berlusconi's coalition partner. Extreme nationalism as interwoven with extreme secular liberalism has of course been routine from nineteenth-century Germany and Italy, though the era of the great dictators, to Geert Wilders and to the present Israeli Cabinet.

National co-ordination was in the hands of Sandro Bondi, a former Communist Party stalwart. Thus was the Berlusconi movement located firmly within the international phenomenon of a Marxism which had merely changed its ending so that the bourgeoisie won, but which had retained intact its Marxist dialectical materialism, its Leninist vanguard elitism and identification of religious or other interests as "Useful Idiots", its Trotskyist entryism and belief in the permanent revolution, and yet also its Stalinist belief that the dictatorship of the victorious class should be built in a superstate and exported, including by force of arms, throughout the world while vanguard elites owe allegiance to that superstate rather than to their own countries. Berlusconi and his court comprised one such vanguard elite.

Others included the Partido Popular, the Irish Progressive Democrats, ACT New Zealand, and the Australian Liberal Party as reconceived by John Howard, to name but a few. At the centre was the faction that made George Bush its brainless Manchurian Candidate within the Republican Party while paying feudal tribute to the Clintons within the Democratic Party. Remind me, how are they all doing these days? Even the takeover of Gaullism by Sarkozy and of German Christian Democracy by Merkel would now seem to be in serious trouble.

Nevertheless, the archetype of bourgeois secular-capitalist insurgency in all its nastiness, Likud, is not only going strong, but in a classic coalition with the secular "free" marketeers who want to strip both an ethnic and a religious minority of their citizenship.

The present Irish Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister has never left Official Sinn Féin, nor has it ever left him, instead simply following and then leading it as it renamed itself the Workers' Party, which renamed itself Democratic Left, and which then took over the central organisation and ideology of the Irish Labour Party, all the while with no confirmed decommissioning of arms until 8th February 2010, within the last 24 hours of the existence of the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning. The ailing Fine Gael, humiliated at the recent Presidential Election, is clearly now in the sights of these Leninist gangsters. They have already succeeded in turning into what was once called "the Bishops' Party" into a vehicle for the most militant anti-Catholicism, even preparing to break by force of law the Seal of the Confessional, as only the regimes most violently hostile to the Faith have ever done.

And the present President of the European Commission was just such a figure when he was Prime Minister of Portugal: a rabidly "free"-marketeering supporter of Bush foreign policy who had previously been a Maoist. Yes, a Maoist. Indeed, he is still just such a figure today, busily staging coups in Italy, Greece, and others yet to come.

But will any such coup be necessary in Britain? Our vanguard elite was comprised of all three of New Labour, the Notting Hill set, and the Orange Book Tendency. If David Cameron had secured an overall majority, or if David Miliband had won the Labour Leadership, then all three of those would now be in government. As it is, two of them are in government while the third spends its time undermining and destabilising the Opposition in the Government interest. Should that present Opposition become the Government, then action against that ascendancy of anti-euro Keynesians might very well be forthcoming.

Not that that ascendancy need be without allies and friends, notably among those whom this whole process had previously dispossessed. Most of the Italian Left has been subsumed into the Democratic Party, which has elected as its President Rosy Bindi, late of Azione Cattolica and Democrazia Cristiana. Her election, together with that of her preferred candidate for Leader, is an immensely positive sign, and she herself deserves much credit for having reached out in this way, when we consider that she lost at least one close friend to the Red Brigades. Their erstwhile supporters exist on the fringes of her major new party. But its internal electoral results leave no doubt as to where its centre of gravity lies, as to what is its mainstream.

The Italian Democrats sit with the British Labour Party in the European Parliament, in a Group which has changed its name in order to accommodate, especially, those Democrats with Christian Democratic backgrounds. Let us hope that this fraternity will have a significant impact on the party famously "owing more to Methodism than to Marx", the historic British vehicle of Social Catholicism, and still the preferred electoral choice of the clear majority of British Catholics.

Many post-War Italian Christian Democrats identified strongly with the Attlee Government's domestic programme, although they also wished to see an Italy outside both NATO and the Soviet Bloc, a bridge between East and West. Domestically and internationally, and complete with the strong admiration for British Labour at home, such was also Jacob Kaiser's post-War vision for a reunited Germany. A vision, sadly, never realised. Not yet, anyway.

8 comments:

  1. Democratic Left and the Progressive Democrats, supposedly polar opposites, helped each other into Seanad Éireann in 1992. Fine Gael, now in coalition with a Labour Party taken over by DL, has been infiltrated by numerous former PDs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In the extremely unlikely event that you have not read it, do take a look at Thomas Fleming's post about Berlusconi and Italy over on Right Minds.

    He thinks that the PCI influence is still too strong in the Democratic Party, but he is very good on how capitalism and conservatism are not the same thing and on how Berlusconi hoodwinked Italy's Catholic conservatives.

    Do you know Thomas Fleming? You and he must have mutual friends from when you were writing for Post-Right. They should bring back Post-Right. If the American Conservative won't, then you and the rest of the old gang should do it yourselves somewhere.

    Right Minds is seriously good. No-one who thinks Catholic Social Teaching means unrestricted capitalism spread by everlasting war. No-one who thinks Britain has the same legal status as Guam, Puerto Rico or American Samoa. No stinking rich SDP dynast with nothing to do except hope that you will post something like this under one of his mediocre posts to make the thread worth reading. None of that.

    We are all abuzz with talk of your next book and the one you are editing. What's this about the one written entirely by you having a collection of responses by the great and the good of the Old Labour and High Tory revivals? You are a postliberal A-lister, Mr Lindsay. You either don't know it or have the decency to pretend you don't. But you are.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, it is a very good piece, even if, yes, I do think that is too hard on the Democrats.

    He and I do have mutual friends, including some of the other PostRight boys. We do sometimes consider possibilities...

    Britain does not even have non-voting representation in the United States Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  4. For the record, I believe it is correct to say that the collection in response to you is being organised by someone else. Are you even writing for it?

    This post is exactly the sort of thing that could and would have appeared on PostRight, so it should be on a similar site somewhere, maybe a consciously more international one. Not one with a washed up Blairite kicked off the New Statesman on it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If they want me to do some sort of response to the responses at the end, then I will. But the whole thing is someone else's project, not mine. Still, news travels quickly, I see.

    Otherwise, watch this space. But stay on topic, please.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Conrad Black ate my hamster12 November 2011 at 22:01

    The postliberal A-list is about right. Blue Labour/Red Tory royalty, that's you.

    I love the way everyone on the Spectator's blogs, no matter how violently they are disagreeing you, still calls you "Mr. Lindsay". Nobody else gets anything like that on there.

    Maybe we should all get used to calling you "My Lord"? It's only a matter of time. 30 years, perhaps. 20 years, more likely. But still, only a matter of time, My Lord.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, yes, please tell TAC to bring back PostRight. You are very in with them, even got Rod Dreher writing the foreword to the American edition of your next book. The fall of the neocons described out in this post has vindicated the PostRight position. If TAC won't or can't bring it back, then you and the rest of that crowd should do it yourself somewhere else. Have you read your PostRight colleague Jack Ross's amazing new book, Rabbi Outcast? One of hundreds of reasons why you all need to get back together somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't see TAC doing it, although I might be wrong. It has moved on, and so have we. But yes, vindicated as we are, we really should get back together somewhere. I'll have a few words in a few ears.

    A review of Jack’s book will appear in my one after next, which will probably out in about a year’s time.

    ReplyDelete