Thursday 5 November 2009

Gunpowder, Treason and Plot

Most Catholics had no idea, and would have disapproved in the strongest possible terms. They, of course, paid the price.

Today of all days, let us consider that eighty per cent of the laws to which we are subject are made by a supranational body which meets in secret and publishes no Official Report. A foreign power maintains a huge military presence here, accountable to nobody. We have no intelligence capability apart from that power's largesse, and are about to spend an eye-wateringly obscene amount of money on yet more nuclear weapons wholly dependent on it. Our foreign policy now consists purely of participation in inter-agency talks at that foreign power's capital.

Several of our MPs are openly, and probably the majority is more-or-less covertly, signed up to the cause of European military integration under overall American command. At least those MPs openly so signed up are under the day-to-day direction, as to the conduct of their parliamentary duties, of a cabal of cranks and crooks an ocean away. The old Members for Moscow had to await telegrams, and even the old Members for Pretoria had to use the landline telephone. But such is progress, for those in both of exactly those same treasonable traditions, now doing their dirty work on behalf of people who are no longer in government in their own country. And as a result, Britain is still embroiled in one of her two most disastrous wars ever, for absolutely no apparent reason.

Meanwhile, a fully armed terrorist organisation is in government in Northern Ireland while still proclaiming its own Army Council to be the sovereign body throughout Ireland. A party at best ambivalent about the Union is in government in Wales. And a party whose activist base is ferociously opposed to the Union is the only party of government in Scotland.

Bring on the bonfires.

15 comments:

  1. 80% of our laws? I just don't believe this. Could you take me through the calculations?

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you don't know this, then you don't know anything. What did you think was the figure? And why?

    ReplyDelete
  3. From 1st December it will be 100% when Lisbon comes into force. So what is Parliament going to be for?

    ReplyDelete
  4. An amendment or a one-clause Bill restoring the supremacy of British over EU law wherever the two conflict.

    For this, we need new MPs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've heard it David. I just don't believe it. And every time I ask people to show me how they worked this out, I get a lot of handwaving. Or pointed to someone else saying the same number, but not showing their working either.

    Look, it's a pretty simple calculation. All we need to know is:

    1) How many laws we are subject to in this country.
    2) How many of those come from the EU.

    So what are the numbers?

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1) One hundred per cent of them;
    2) Eighty per cent of them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Oh, come on David. I think it's pretty obvious Talleyrand was asking for real numbers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. There was an interesting BBC programme exploring this recently - unfortunately the text isn't printed anywhere, but it's worth a listen. In brief, it's not a straightforward question.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And he got them. 100 and 80 are both real. You can have 100 coat hangers. Or 80 bananas. Really.

    He's just being tiresome. No one disputes any of this.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "an interesting BBC programme"

    Unbiased, I'm sure...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, listen and see.

    After all, you're far from unbiased, and yet you still seem to think you're right about stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No, David, I meant the raw numbers from which the percentage was calculated. The only way you can ever arrive at a percentage is by performing some fairly simple division with the real numbers.

    There are a lot of things that "everybody knows" but most of these turn out to be false. I'm assuming you're not just parroting the 80% stat because it fits with your beliefs - you must have checked it out. I'm just asking to see the working.

    ReplyDelete
  13. So, you're advocating some sort of violent, flame-oriented uprising?

    ReplyDelete
  14. There's another really good analysis of this question here, which is well worth reading.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Talleyrand, Google it.

    Steve, perish the thought.

    Jo, another unbiased source...

    ReplyDelete