What, precisely, is wrong with it?
And why, precisely?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Political prisoner, activist, journalist, hymn-writer, emerging thinktanker, aspiring novelist, "tribal elder", 2019 parliamentary candidate for North West Durham, Shadow Leader of the Opposition, "Speedboat", "The Cockroach", eagerly awaiting the second (or possibly third) attempt to murder me.
Helping Hamas is wrong. If that is where the money from the appeal will go, then it is wrong. Otherwise, it is perfectly fine.
ReplyDeleteWell, the charities involved are largely church-based, Royal-sponsored, or both. The three commercial terrestrial newtorks have relented. The Murdoch-owned Sky sattelite network will probably have done so by Monday. Yet the BBC holds out...
ReplyDeleteThe BBC is scene in the US and in Israel as so biased against the US and Israel that, perhaps, it was thought that the BBC would be taken more seriously in such places if it did an act showing it is neutral. That is perfectly imaginable to me.
ReplyDeleteAs I have blogged here in the past, the BBC only looks pro-Palestinain (or, at least, anti-Isreali) compared to the hysterically pro-Israeli fare served up without any sort of alternative in the United States.
ReplyDeleteOr compared to the Times, the Sunday Times, the Daily Telegraph (at least until this conflict, and still to a very large extent), the Sunday Telegraph (likewise), the Daily Mail, the Mail on Sunday (more or less), the Sun and the News of the World, collectively accounting for almost every national newspaper bought in this country.
Now even the BBC has stopped bothering, and sided with such interests against all three main political parties, both Archbishops of the Church of England, everyone. What does anyone think that Hamas would do with, for example, blankets?