Sarah B. Rogers, the United States Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, has cited among her “civilizational concerns” the fact that the United Kingdom had not banned the cousin marriage that was unconditionally legal in 18 of the United States plus the District of Columbia, and conditionally legal in a further six.
Proponents of such a ban here should ask themselves why there was not one already. There did used to be. Until the Reformation, the Late Roman ban on marriage to the fourth degree of consanguinity had obtained, extended to affinity because in marriage, “the two shall become one flesh”. Catholic Canon Law has therefore always banned cousin marriage, at one time to the seventh degree, although with possibilities of dispensation since the ban was not in the Bible. Such dispensations did the Hapsburgs no good.
The legality of marriages between first cousins is a product of the Reformation. Its prevalence until the First World War, and as recently as that, was a badge of Protestant honour, since Henry VIII had legalised it when he had wanted to marry Catherine Howard, who was Anne Boleyn’s first cousin, and since although William and Mary never had children, the intention had been that they would, and they were first cousins whose marriage would not ordinarily have been possible in the Catholic Church. Does the Orange Order now wish to ban a marriage such as William of Orange’s? Would the four stripes of Northern Irish Unionist in the House of Commons vote for that ban?
This seems to be a Two Cultures thing. Although Charles and Emma Darwin were first cousins who had 10 children, and although Albert and Elsa Einstein were both maternal first cousins and paternal second cousins such that her maiden name was Einstein, the mere thought of this practice is profoundly shocking to scientists. But to people formed by the study of literature and history, then, while that is where it belongs, that is where you will find it routinely. Mainstream British society was educated out of it, and not very long ago, so that can obviously be done. South Asians are hardly unreceptive to education. Between 1979 and 1981, the makers and viewers of To the Manor Born took it as read that Audrey fforbes-Hamilton’s late husband had been her cousin. Although Coronation Street does not, both Emmerdale and EastEnders still feature such arrangements between white characters whose families were supposed to have lived in Emmerdale or Walford since time out of mind, and that seems to raise no eyebrows.
Anglo-Saxons and Scotch-Irish still regularly marry their first cousins in several of the parts of the United States that were most likely to vote for Donald Trump, and they did so as a matter of course into the very recent past. But if the argument is that this was something that certain other ethnic groups did, then it is probably better to treat it as a health education matter rather than a criminal one. After all, that was what worked with everyone else. Nineteenth-century novels are full of marriages between first cousins as the most normal thing in the world, and Queen Victoria and Prince Albert were first cousins. By descent from that marriage, the King’s parents were third cousins, while they were also second cousins once removed through a different line. But the King is a last hurrah of that sort of thing. His mother was one of the least inbred monarchs ever, and his son and grandson are not at all inbred. Educate people, and it will mostly or entirely die out. That worked with everyone else. Even the Royal Family.
You have to wonder what the type that turn up to Tommy Robinson marches think they're defending.
ReplyDeleteBut didn't one of the Darwins' children have Down's syndrome?
You only have to look at them to see why they are so vexed about cousin marriage. They know. Through both of his related parents, the King is of course descended from Muhammad via Elizabeth of York, whose part-Moorish Royal lines on the Iberian Peninsula stretched back through the Kings of Portugal and Castile, to the old Moorish Kings of Seville. Robert Graves was once ushered away from the then Queen after he had mentioned their common descent from the Prophet of Islam, but it is widely known in an entirely matter-of-fact way across the Islamic world.
DeleteThe youngest, Charles, probably did, yes. But that is not caused by inbreeding, and his brothers included the astronomer Sir George Darwin FRS, the botanist Sir Francis Darwin FRS, the civil engineer Sir Horace Darwin FRS, and the economist Leonard Darwin, President of the Royal Geographical Society.
Anglo-Saxons and Scotch-Irish still regularly marry their first cousins in several of the parts of the United States that were most likely to vote for Donald Trump
DeleteINCONVENIENT FACT CHECK
First-cousin marriage in Appalachia is
not significantly more common than in other regions, despite stereotypes, with studies showing inbreeding levels aren't uniquely high, though localized family intermarriage (more distant cousins) does occur, often due to rural isolation and limited partners, creating a perception of widespread inbreeding, but it's not a dominant practice compared to global rates.
Key Findings:
Not Unique: Research, including a significant 1980 study, concluded that consanguineous marriages (including first-cousin unions) in Appalachia are not exceptionally high compared to other areas or historical periods in America.
Stereotype vs. Reality: The perception of extreme inbreeding is largely a stereotype, partly used to rationalize social inequality, while actual first-cousin marriage rates remain low, similar to general U.S. trends, notes.
Rural Isolation: While first-cousin marriage was rare, marriage between more distant cousins (like second or third) was more common in isolated rural areas like Appalachia, as it was a way to keep land and family together when mates were scarce.
Genealogy Evidence: Genealogical research in the region reveals frequent intermarriage among just a few families, leading to high relatedness but not necessarily high rates of technically defined "inbreeding" (parent-child, siblings, first cousins).
In Summary: While you'll find extensive family interconnections in Appalachian genealogy, the idea that first-cousin marriage is a widespread norm is a misconception; it's generally uncommon, just like elsewhere, but the perception is strong due to stereotypes and the density of family ties.