Friday 10 December 2010

The Greatest Briton?

Desecrating the Cenotaph is unforgivable, but urinating on a certain statue is altogether a different matter.

In the 1930s, there were two British threats to constitutionality and, via Britain’s role in the world, to international stability. One came from an unreliable, opportunistic, highly affected and contrived, anti-Semitic, white supremacist, Eurofederalist demagogue who admired Mussolini, heaped praise on Hitler, had no need to work for a living, had an overwhelming sense of his own entitlement, profoundly hated democracy, and had a callous disregard for the lives of the lower orders and the lesser breeds. So did the other one. Far more than background united Churchill and Mosley, originator in English of the currently modish concept of a Union of the Mediterranean.

In Great Contemporaries, published in 1937, two years after he had called Hitler’s achievements “among the most remarkable in the whole history of the world”, Churchill wrote that: “Those who have met Herr Hitler face to face in public business or on social terms have found a highly competent, cool, well-informed, functionary with an agreeable manner, a disarming smile, and few have been unaffected by a subtle personal magnetism.” That passage was not removed from the book’s reprint in 1941. In May 1940, Churchill had been all ready to give Gibraltar, Malta, Suez, Somaliland, Kenya and Uganda to Mussolini.

All sorts of things about Churchill are simply ignored. Gallipoli. The miners. The Suffragettes. The refusal to bomb the railway lines to Auschwitz. His dishonest and self-serving memoirs. The truth about the catastrophic humiliation at Dunkirk. The other one, at Singapore, which as much as anything else has been an inspiration to the vociferous anti-monarchist minority in Australia ever since: “Why should we bother with them after that?” The Lancastria. The men left behind in France. Both the fact and the sheer scale of his 1945 defeat while the War in the Far East was still going on, when Labour won half of his newly divided seat, and an Independent did very well in the other half after Labour and the Liberals had disgracefully refused to field candidates against him. His deselection by his local Conservative Association just before he died. And not least, his carve-up of Eastern Europe with Stalin, so very reminiscent of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

But the electorate was under no illusions while he was still alive. His image was booed and hissed when it appeared on newsreels. He led the Conservative Party into three General Elections, he lost the first two of them – the first, I say again, while the War was still going on – and he only returned to office on the third occasion with the support of the National Liberals, having lost the popular vote. In the course of that Parliament, he had to be removed by his own party. It went on to win comfortably the subsequent General Election, just as it was to do in 1992 after it had removed Thatcher.

And we have not forgotten the truth about him in the old mining areas. Nor have they in the places that he signed away to Stalin, including the country for whose freedom the War was fought, making it a failure in its own terms. We condemn genocidal terrorism against Slavs and Balts no less than genocidal terrorism against Arabs, or the blowing up of British Jews going about their business as civil servants, or the photographed hanging of teenage British conscripts with barbed wire.

7 comments:

  1. This looks familiar. Ah yes, you've just copied and pasted what you've written before.

    FYI most of the country does not live within the old mining areas. He was cheered on the balcony of Buckingham Palace on VE Day, thousands turned out for his funeral and I suspect any booing at newsreels was by an unrepresentative minority.

    Frankly I don't see how this getting at Churchill helps your cause. There's not a silent majority of people out there who have it in for him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your comment that "In May 1940, Churchill had been all ready to give Gibraltar, Malta, Suez, Somaliland, Kenya and Uganda to Mussolini," is certainly mistaken as regards to Malta (and, I suspect, to the others too).

    I suggest you read "Ambassador on Special Mission" by Samuel Hoare. It is an excellent account (and well written) of the thinking, during WW2, of Churchill and the British Government as regards the Mediterranean dictators, and how to handle them. Churchill had a very clear understanding of how to protect and secure British interests.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was the Royal Family who were cheered on VE Day. The votes that Mr Lindsay wants are in an old mining area. And, as he writes:

    "[Churchill] led the Conservative Party into three General Elections, he lost the first two of them – the first, I say again, while the War was still going on – and he only returned to office on the third occasion with the support of the National Liberals, having lost the popular vote. In the course of that Parliament, he had to be removed by his own party. It went on to win comfortably the subsequent General Election, just as it was to do in 1992 after it had removed Thatcher."

    You can't argue with that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And then there was his Zionism, motivated by the view that the Jews were not really British, so should go away to Palestine. Exactly the Zionism of the BNP. As Nick Griffin says, if Churchill were alive today, then he would be in the BNP.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "It was the Royal Family who were cheered on VE Day."

    And when Churchill appeared on the balcony the cheering increased.

    Yes, Churchill did lose elections (still getting over %40 of the vote) but it's absurd to suggest that other factors did not play a part - Labour's association with the popular welfare state or Tory association with appeasement for example.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They were both equally associated with those equally popular and equally sensible policies.

    Churchill's warmongering was unpopular before, during and after the War. Attitudes to him only changed once he was dead, a generation after the War had ended, by which point it was becoming sentimentalised in that Dad's Army way.

    If Labour had contested Churchill's seat in 1945, then he would have lost it. Imagine that.

    ReplyDelete