A wave of apathy will sweep across Britain tomorrow, as
no more than one in three electors go to the polls to vote in the European
Parliament election.
This is understandable and almost commendable.
Most people sense that the itinerant “parliament” is a charade,
the pseudo-democratic gloss on a European Union that is fundamentally
anti-democratic and anti-working class.
It has no powers to initiate legislation or new taxation and its
amendments can be batted back and forth until they are rendered ineffective.
The talking shop’s only real power — to sack the entire EU
Commission — is a “nuclear” option which brings the whole EU gravy train to a
halt, gravy-splattered MEPs and all.
Real power in the EU lies with member state ministers in the
European Council, with the unelected commissioners and with the unaccountable
European Central Bank and misnamed European Court of Justice (ECJ).
With the average MEP in Britain purporting to represent more than
three quarters of a million people, elective democracy on this scale is too big
for any meaningful, organic link to exist between the electors and the elected.
There is nothing accidental about this set-up.
It has been designed to ensure that the neoliberal economic
philosophy of the EU and its basic treaties and institutions cannot be
overturned by the democratic will of Europe’s peoples.
The capitalist monopolies of Europe must be free to move capital,
labour, goods and services across the continent in order to maximise profit.
Spearheaded by Baroness Ashton, the High Representative for EU
Foreign Affairs who rose to the position without a trace and has never been
elected by anyone to anything, the EU strives to impose its neoliberal doctrine
on the rest of the world.
She it was who joined US warmongers in whipping up the Kiev
protesters to overthrow the elected government of Ukraine, knowing that
nationalist and fascist elements would lead the charge.
And the response of Britain’s main political parties to an EU
which stands so clearly for austerity, privatisation and a military drive
eastwards as part of the US strategic “pivot” to Asia? Silence.
Nothing about the misery inflicted on millions of workers and
their families from Spain and Portugal to Greece and Cyprus.
Nothing about the ECJ judgments in the Viking, Ruffert, Laval and
Luxembourg cases which undermine trade union and employment rights in all
member states.
Nothing about the militarisation of the EU, as its military
structures collaborate ever more closely with those of the US and Nato.
Instead, all we’ve had from Labour, the Lib Dems, Plaid Cymru and
the SNP is a pile of Euro-guff that might as well have been drafted in
Brussels.
The Tories have been more ambiguous because, like Ukip, they
favour neoliberalism but want to protect the spivs and speculators of the City
of London from any EU regulation.
This leaves only one progressive choice for electors in Scotland,
Wales, London and the Yorkshire & Humber, North West, West Midlands and
Eastern constituencies of England tomorrow if they want to vote against EU
militarism, austerity and privatisation.
A vote for No2EU — Yes to Workers’ Rights is a vote from the left
against the EU, big business and the right.
In the other constituencies, every vote which counts against the Tories, Lib Dems, Ukip and fascists will be valuable.
In the other constituencies, every vote which counts against the Tories, Lib Dems, Ukip and fascists will be valuable.
A wasted vote.
ReplyDeleteNo2EU is nowhere in the polls- it won't come 20th.
You may as well chuck your ballot paper in the nearest barbecue.
The only anti-EU party in the running for this is UKIP.
Any other anti-EU party has no chance of even coming fourth.
UKIP is a racist party. There is now no getting away from that fact. It stands exposed for all to see.
ReplyDeleteAnd tomorrow would have been its swansong, anyway. It is going to come second after all; the eve-of-poll polls are unambiguous.
But it came second last time, so that will constitute no improvement whatever. It's over.
No it isn't. Nobody outside the chattering classes believes a word of that tripe-as the polls show. Peter Hitchens and Christopher Booker wouldn't be caught dead praising a racist party.
ReplyDeleteThe media campaign has failed. And spectacularly so.
No2EU is a spoiled ballot paper. It's a wasted vote. Why do it?
We shall see on Sunday. UKIP is going to take the same spot that it took last time, which was also one year before it failed to win a single Commons seat.
ReplyDeleteBut even if it came first this week, then it would still fail to win a Commons seat next year. It is not even over. It never began.
The left-wing opposition to the EU, although somewhat dispersed, will still be there, constantly replenished, and increasingly setting Labour's and the unions' agenda as the TTIP became the main issue in relation to the EU.
Whereas the Farageists will just go back to their saloon bars until they die, which will be in the fairly near future.
The effect of electing a UKIP MEP and the effect of not electing a No2EU MEP are exactly the same, since UKIP does not turn up, anyway.
Farage has never voted in 15 years as an MEP. But he has drawn the salary, and vast expenses.
If UKIP won this week, then what do you think would happen? What, exactly? Nothing, that's what. Absolutely nothing. A wasted vote, indeed.
And a racist vote. As no one any longer even attempts to deny. Those are the votes which UKIP actually and actively wants.
Christopher Booker and Peter Hitchens have both bitterly opposed racist parties like the BNP. They wouldn't dream of defending a racist party like they've both defended us.
ReplyDeleteNigel Farage made a very left-wing argument on the radio-that's why I disagreed with it.
Like the Left, Farage thinks poverty causes crime. So he said the fact Romania is far poorer than Germany is the reason for its disproportionately high levels of crime (recorded in British police figures).
I, not being a leftist, don't think poverty causes crime. I disagree with Farage.
But it wasn't a racist point. All three races are white Europeans-and the police figures do prove a disparity in crime levels.
If personally blame cultural factors-particularly the absence of authority and family in the wake of Communism.
Poverty isn't the reason.
The Morning Star is a national daily newspaper with staff in the Parliamentary Press Gallery, "the Lobby". A member of the Lobby will have written this.
ReplyDeleteWhich paper like that, which journalist like that, has ever said to vote Ukip? Not one ever. Never will, either. Could not survive if ever did. Be laughed out of existence.
Hitchens (not in the Lobby, although doubt he minds) has not told his readers to vote Ukip, just set out "the best possible" reason to do so. A clever and important distinction.
All the party leaders deny it. And no one has ever identified a single "racist" UKIP policy. They've had enough time...
ReplyDeleteBut they can't. Because of course it's all baloney. You've had your head buried in the media too long.
Farage's comments were left-wing. He blamed poverty for crime.
Specifically for the fact Romania (far poorer than Germany) has a higher crime rate.
I don't agree poverty causes crime.
But there was absolutely nothing racist about it at all.
A clever and important distinction, indeed.
ReplyDeleteAs for that "all the same race" business, you actually do not the meaning of the words that you are using.
You don't know anything about Romania, either. One thing that the place most certainly does not lack is family authority. At least Nigel Farage knows what I mean, I do have to give him that.
Next, you'll be telling me that the Eastern Bloc regimes were all enemies of the Orthodox Churches. Even Romania. Even the Soviet Union. Nay, even very Bulgaria.
Go on. I bet that you think it.
Hitchens has several times urged a UKIP vote-and admitted so this week. You haven't been reading since the weekend.
ReplyDeleteSo did the Telegraph's Christopher Booker-who said he'll vote UKIP.
Neither-both enemies of the BNP-would ever defend a racist party as they've defended us.
Hitchens has today forced the BBC to apologise for suggesting his article was anti-UKIP and written it was in fact " pro UKIP".
Again, he wouldn't dream of doing anything of the sort for a racist party.
It isn't and never has been.
As borne out by the fact that, unlike, say, racist parties, it's never had any racist policies. Ever.
Antagonising your core vote is only good politics if you have any other potential voters.
ReplyDeleteA party which can only ever have a core vote (and which can therefore do quite well in a party list system, but stands no chance under First Past The Post) cannot go around doing that sort of thing.
Asked, "What do you mean by not racist?", the answers would very quickly indeed become, "Not the opinions of UKIP supporters, members, activists, candidates, and elected representatives."
They already do.
Their policies aren't, maybe. Their people are, mostly. Their leader is, definitely.
ReplyDeleteExactly.
ReplyDeleteAt least with regard to those who will still be voting for it after another year of all of this.
But that will only be half of one third of the European Election turnout. That is only about one in 36 eligible voters.
It may even turn out to be lower than that. Quite probably, in fact.
Although sending Bob Crow a heart attack would be beyond even the great David Lindsay, you could not have planned it better for NO2EU to be unable to contest the North East right when you were getting back in with everyone in Labour that matters.
ReplyDeleteIf there is a media campaign against Ukip and Farage, does that mean Simon Heffer, Peter Hitchens, the Daily Politics, Newsnight, the Today programme and Question Time are all not part of the media, but you, David Lindsay, are?
I suppose that it must, yes.
ReplyDeleteUkip candidate for mayor of Lewisham arrested for sex attack on homeless Bulgarian man - http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ukip-candidate-peter-lello-arrested-3585403#.U30m2msUqSs
ReplyDeleteThe Lanchester Review is obviously not part of the media, it published a call to vote Ukip by a man who has been kicked out of it.
ReplyDeleteThe likes of Oliver Kamm and Jon Simons are particularly adamant that the Review is, "not a newspaper."
ReplyDeleteIt is not a houseboat or a mint julep, either, so I am not sure what their point is.
And it least it is not a loss-making dependent of Sun Bingo, without which Kamm would starve to death.
Further to my last comment.
ReplyDeleteRe; Anon
Simon Heffer and Peter Hitchens are most certainly not mainstream, if that's what you mean.
Which is what I like most about them. And what, I suspect, draws them to us.
They see all the national papers-every one-dancing to the Tory tune and slagging off UKIP-and feel nothing but disgust for their trade.
That's what makes them better.
It's the disgust all free people feel when they see a flock of media toadies loyally following Dear Leader and the Establishment.
It is impossible to be more mainstream than a columnist on the Daily Mail or the Mail on Sunday. By definition.
ReplyDeleteYou have not answered the other Anon's very good question about the BBC's flagship programmes, which Farage and his supporters are never off. Or are those not mainstream, either?