Due

Since time immemorial, a party which sells itself as social-democratic with a strong patriotic streak, and a party which sells itself as patriotic with (at least since the War, and even if it does not use the term) a strong social-democratic streak, have both allowed non-domicile status to exist and flourish. Even now, there is no proposal from either of them to abolish it. Why not? Surely not because, at the highest levels, neither of them is really social-democratic or patriotic at all? For that would require that they be replaced with this.