Sunday 26 November 2023

It Did Not Scare Us – It Empowered Us

From what has proved to be the peerless Al Jazeera:

Old City, occupied East Jerusalem – After learning that settlers had returned to bulldoze in an area of the parking lot near his house in the Armenian Quarter, 80-year-old Garo Nalbandian, a professional photographer, joined a community sit-in in the area known as the Cows’ Garden with, of course, his trusty camera.

“We won’t leave,” a determined Nalbandian said gruffly in between snapping photos of Armenians on one side of the makeshift barricade and Israeli police and hired security on the other.

Since then, representatives from the company, Xana Gardens, have sent contractors, armed settlers and bulldozers to seize the land – which, along with the parking lot, includes Armenian Church property and the homes of Nalbandian and four other families.

The 1,600-year-old Armenian community is concentrated in the confines of the Armenian Quarter, occupying 14 percent of the Old City of Jerusalem at its southwestern corner.

“You know all your neighbours. If I don’t have milk at 1am, I just knock on their door. If I don’t have bread, I call my friend,” said Setrag Balian, 26, one of the leaders of the current movement to reverse the land deal.

“We take care of each other’s kids, of our families.”

This Armenian community – the oldest Armenian diaspora in the world – has seen its population decline from some 27,000 people a century ago to about 1,000 today.

Yet, with each attempted demolition, the community flocks in numbers at a moment’s notice, standing in the way of bulldozers while withstanding threats of arrest and armed intimidation.

Nalbandian’s family risks losing the home they’ve lived in since 1969, under the deal. Garo’s wife, Hrout, whose family has been in Jerusalem as far back as the 8th or 9th century, describes her sweet memories of the decades of getting engaged, married and raising kids in their modest one-storey home.

“Wherever we walk, it’s like we are in Armenia,” she said. “We have like a big family for the Armenians. After so many years … to become homeless, this is very hard.”

Garo’s studio in Wadi al-Joz is adorned with breathtaking photos he has taken of streets and cities around the world, from Athens to Alexandria. “But our beautiful Armenian Quarter is like nowhere else,” Garo remarked. “We must protect it.”

A controversial deal

The community’s suspicions of Israeli settler aspirations in the Cows’ Garden started in 2019 when an Israeli company began construction on that same parking lot. At the time, the patriarchate told the community the aim was to renovate the lot, nothing more, but the parking lot’s April 2021 inauguration was curiously attended by Moshe Lion, the mayor of Jerusalem, and bedecked with enough Israeli flags to raise eyebrows.

The Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem – the community’s spiritual leadership, biggest employer and de facto landlord – struck a deal in July that year with Xana Gardens, a company incorporated that same month and led by the Australian Israeli investor Danny Rothman.

For two years, church leaders kept the community in the dark about the terms or even existence of the deal, despite persistent rumours. On April 1 this year, witnesses say, Rothman – also known in documents as Danny Rubenstein and Danny Kaufman – came to the Cows’ Garden parking lot with security, breaking security cameras and dismissing patriarchate guards, claiming he was taking over.

As years of rumours and suspicions about the deal spilled into the open, Setrag Balian and Hagop Djernazian, 23, led the younger generation of Armenians in fighting the land takeover. Balian, who works for his family’s ceramics business, joined Djernazian, a student at Hebrew University, for months of protests near Armenian Patriarch Nourhan Manougian’s offices.

“I see myself creating my future here,” said Djernazian, who also leads the Armenian Scouts. “I study here, I work here, I live here. And this is my plan to continue living here. The deal threatens our continued existence here.”

A report in July this year by an international team of Armenian lawyers finally exposed the deal publicly.

In it, the patriarchate agreed to give Xana Gardens a 49-year lease – with an option to renew another 49 – of the Cows’ Garden to build a luxury hotel.

Only Xana Gardens could cancel the agreement, which was for at least 11,500 square metres (123,785 square feet), but Xana could include “adjacent properties in the project”.

A plan submitted by Danny Rothman to the Jerusalem Municipality in May sought 14,500sq metres – not 11,500 – for the hotel, with a “target area” of 16,000sq metres (172,222sq feet), according to the report on the deal. Such an area would encompass 13 percent of the entire Armenian Quarter.

For this large swath of prized land on contested Mount Zion, Xana Gardens would pay only $300,000 in yearly rent.

Miran Krikorian, 40, a restaurant owner born and raised in the Armenian Quarter, says he pays nearly a quarter of that amount for only 30 square metres (323 square feet) he rents nearby for his small restaurant in the Christian Quarter.

“Either somebody got money under the table to pass this deal, or it’s just our people are so dumb that they don’t know the prices in this country,” said Krikorian.

Growing pressure, growing threats For months, newly installed security guards from Xana Gardens threatened to ban community members from using the parking lot if they attended the protests, adding to threats church officials allegedly made towards individuals who protested. But the community refused to relent.

Pressure on the church to cancel the deal increased when Jordan and the Palestinian Authority withdrew their recognition of Patriarch Manougian in May, as they saw the deal threatening the status quo in the Old City, and amid concerns that stakeholders had not been consulted. The PA, Jordan and Israel are the three political authorities that endow recognition to the patriarchs in Jerusalem. The patriarchate did not respond to a request for comments.

“A lot of the younger generation had to learn through this ordeal why it’s important to stay in Jerusalem and why presence matters,” said Kegham Balian, Setrag’s brother and a Jerusalemite Armenian who has written and reported on the issue for Armenian news outlets such as 301.

Manougian’s decision to cancel the deal on October 26 put to rest the Armenian community’s internal divide on the issue. Later that same day, however, Israeli heavy machinery arrived at the disputed site to try to begin demolition.

Armenians rushed to the Cows’ Garden, standing in front of machinery that was tearing up a pavement and a wall separating the patriarchate parking lot from the community parking lot.

Ten days later, on November 5, representatives from Xana Gardens, including Rothman, returned. This time, they brought about 15 settlers with them, several of them armed and leading leashed dogs.

“This is our land,” they reportedly told local Armenians. “Leave now.”

But the Armenians refused to leave. A tense standoff ensued for hours, with more settlers arriving and yet more Armenians joining, eventually overwhelming the armed settlers.

Some of the settlers attempted to provoke community members, residents said. “You’re all goys, and when the Messiah comes, you will die,” one of them told them.

“I will get you, one by one!” George Warwar, a Christian Arab from Jaffa who had been the face of Xana Gardens on the ground in the months leading up to the encounter, reportedly shouted.

This was the first time most in the community had encountered Rothman, who, when approached by journalists, has refused to speak to the media. According to Setrag Balian, Rothman, who normally lives overseas, told police during the standoff the community wanted to cancel the deal because he is Jewish.

“It’s because now you’re bringing armed settlers and showing the true face of your company,” Setrag Balian recalled telling Rothman that day. “It’s because this deal is not a good deal for the patriarchate. 

“We’ve lived with our Jewish Quarter neighbours for 50 years without any major incidents,” he continued.

The act of peaceful defiance forced Rothman and his group to withdraw after several hours.

“Just by the look on Danny Rothman’s face,” said Kegham Balian, “you could tell he wasn’t expecting the events to unfold like they did that day.”

‘It did not scare us – it empowered us’

Negotiations are under way for the church to provide greater transparency regarding the administration of community lands and affairs, a key demand from protesters.

With the internal divide on the land agreement now set aside – and the war in Gaza drawing the world’s attention – Armenian residents say Xana Gardens’ tactics are shifting to outright armed confrontation.

“They thought it would scare us,” said Setrag Balian of the armed threats. “But it didn’t scare us – it empowered us. We are more united than ever.”

Manougian, often criticised by Armenians for an absence in leadership, has been present during standoffs this month. A November 16 communique by the Armenian Patriarchate described the situation as “possibly the greatest existential threat of its 16-century history”, condemning the 2021 contract as “tainted with false representation, undue influence, and unlawful benefits”.

Armenians fear their small, tight-knit community won’t survive if they lose the Cows’ Garden, which comprises much of the Armenian Quarter outside the Armenian Convent – a private area originally intended for clergy, but now housing many Armenians who moved there about a century ago in the aftermath of the Armenian Genocide.

The prized land is seen as pivotal to Israeli settler plans, as a long-term lease would complete a path for Jewish worshippers to cross the Old City from Jaffa Gate to the Jewish Quarter without crossing Christian properties, following previous purchases of the New Imperial Hotel and Petra Hotel along that route.

Since the first armed confrontation by Rothman and settlers, Armenians have been taking shifts at the Cows’ Garden, where two bulldozers are parked.

Contractors hired by Xana Gardens attempted to bulldoze the area early in the morning on November 12 and 13. Both times, the community sprang into action, putting up a metal barricade on the 12 and, on the 13, standing in a bulldozer’s path.

The community has remained nonviolent throughout the confrontations, at the behest of movement leaders like Balian and Djernazian.

As demolition attempts by the company continue – including an incident on November 15 in which Palestinians hired by Xana Gardens to dismantle the barricade left when they realised they had been hired by settlers – the community remains resolute.

During the standoffs, police threatened to arrest Armenians, and several have been arrested for transgressions like shouting, according to community members. They were released the same day, but banned by police from returning to the area.

Police have attempted to enforce the bulldozing efforts – although they have failed so far with Xana Gardens unable to present the required permits – before the land deal finds its way to court to be adjudicated, as stakeholders expect to happen.

A rotating group of Armenians now sleeps in the Cows’ Garden at night, and community members provide volunteers with food, tea, couches and even a tent for 24/7 surveillance.

“This has to do with the future of my kid,” said Krikorian of his four-year-old boy, his eyes welling with tears.

“If I think about all those things that my kid is going to lose, like this community, like being with his friends … I grew up in that, and I want him to have the same experiences.

“If I don’t do anything now, I’m going to lose it for him in the future.”

20 comments:

  1. Peter Hitchens is interesting on Twitter on the origins of the term “Palestinian.”

    @clarkemicah Yes, @maggie_lavan
    British Arabists, who disapproved of the Balfour Declaration, were very keen on the name 'Palestine' . They were Classicists who knew the name was a deliberate Roman humiliation, renaming formerly Jewish territory after the Jews' oldest enemies, the Philistines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is in Herodotus.

      He is out of his depth.

      Delete
    2. Gaza was always in Philistia anyhow.

      Delete
    3. Indeed. Consider the bombing of the Church of Saint Porphyrius, which has never been noted as a stronghold either of Hamas or of Islamic Jihad. Although the present building dates from the twelfth century, a church on that site was first mentioned in 425, only five years after the death of Saint Porphyrius, who as Bishop of Gaza had Christianised what had been a recalcitrantly Pagan city because of course it was in old Philistia, meaning that its synagogue had never paid tribute directly to the Temple at Jerusalem, since it was not in the Land of Israel.

      With its capital at Jerusalem, the Kingdom of Israel only ever had four Kings, over a grand total of 117 years. Without Jerusalem, it lasted another 210 years, giving 327 in total. Retaining Jerusalem, the strictly distinct Kingdom of Judah lasted 343 years after the United Monarchy's 117, still only 460 in all of history, but in any case Judah's name was not Israel, which was that of somewhere else.

      Palestine occurs as that strip of land's name internationally no later than the fifth century BC, has always been what at least some of its own people called it, was its only name for 1878 years until 1948, is still what the majority of its people call it, and is what they call it in Jericho, the oldest continuous settlement in the world, some of whose avowedly Palestinian inhabitants are of lines that have lived there for 11,000 years.

      Delete
    4. "I know a lady in Venice would have walked barefoot to Palestine for a touch of his nether lip."

      Delete
    5. "Richard, that robb'd the lion of his heart, and fought the holy wars in Palestine." So that is twice in Shakespeare alone.

      Even the Hasmoneans, the Maccabi in Maccabi Tel Aviv and in the Hannukah story, did not call their Jerusalem-based priest-kingdom "Israel". They called it "Judea", of course a Hellenisation of "Judah", even after it had expanded to include most of what the world called "Palestine", following Herodotus, who had called it only what everyone else did.

      Define a country, of course, but in the sense that there has rarely been a state called Wales but there has been such a country for a very long time, there has been a country called Palestine, according to at least a lot of the people in it and the whole of the rest of the world, for a very, very, very long time, indeed.

      There has been in any sense a country called Israel for all of 402 years in the whole of history, and any part of Jerusalem has been in it for a grand total of 192. The Old City, the bit that would seem to matter for the present purpose and to which this post refers, was in Israel, which never claimed to have founded it, for 117 years ever, ending 2953 years ago.

      Delete
    6. When the Jewish Agency's men in Washington went to see Truman for advance recognition of the new state, they couldn't tell him what it's name would be.

      Delete
    7. Most people had assumed "Judaea", as the King James Bible spells it. But next to none of historic Judea was going to be in the new State. They also thought about Zion, but of course Mount Zion overlooks the Old City of Jerusalem, so the same problem presented itself.

      On 12th May 1948, David Ben-Gurion put "State of Israel" to the People's Administration. It was recorded that there were seven votes in favour. There were rather more than seven members. On 14th May, in Tel Aviv Museum, Ben-Gurion announced that, "We hereby declare the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz-Israel, to be known as the State of Israel." So that was that.

      Delete
  2. “Define a country of course.”

    You know perfectly well what it means-there has never been a state called Palestine (it was the name of a British colony) so Israel never “occupied” anything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, like a language, a country is a notoriously difficult thing to define. You just cannot be very well-educated. Accordingly, your second point is nonsense.

      Delete
  3. David Lindsay pretends above that he doesn’t know what a country means which is at least a step above those who think there was once a country called Palestine that was “occupied” by Israel. For a place to be “occupied” it needs to have been a sovereign state to begin with-the area that is now the “occupied territories” was only ever a colony not a state (that changed hands between the Ottoman Empire, the British, Transjordan and Egypt).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drivel. Read books as well as newspaper columns.

      Delete
  4. It’s a fact and very easy to define. The area was never a sovereign state. So it cannot have been “illegally occupied.”

    By the way Abigail Mor Edan, four years old, was kidnapped by Hamas after her parents were murdered on the October 7th pogrom.

    That’s the vile organisation whose flags are on display at your marches-and you think Tommy Robinson’ as problem?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everything is simple when you are simple.

      Delete
    2. Try a country's easy to define on Kamm, he would also agree with Mr. L. that a language is hard to define.

      Delete
    3. But don't let that put you off.

      Delete
  5. 402 years of anywhere called Israel. 508 of an Israel or Judah with any part of Jerusalem in it, 460 with the Old City in it. How old is the Armenian Quarter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 1700 years, give or take. It is clear from the Bible, and from everything else, that the Israelites did not found Jerusalem.

      The Bible just seems to presuppose that they were never the majority, with lengthy denunciations both of that fact and of the prevalence of intermarriage appearing over a long period.

      And between the post-Constantinian Romans, the Byzantines, the Crusaders, and the British, Christian sovereignty is the historical norm both for the Holy City and for the Holy Land.

      Delete
  6. Bloody hell you know a lot about this, what do you think of the extension of the ceasefire?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A total humiliation of Keir Starmer and of a march too trashy even for him.

      Delete