The position of the Catholic Church is fully borne out by the facts, and is unique in being so.
Certain people might consider applying some journalistic or scientific objectivity to the question of where in Africa the condom use relentlessly promoted by Western nongovernmental organisations and compliant governments has ever arrested, never mind reversed, the rate of HIV infection.
There is nowhere.
Certain people might consider applying some journalistic or scientific objectivity to the question of where in Africa the condom use relentlessly promoted by Western nongovernmental organisations and compliant governments has ever arrested, never mind reversed, the rate of HIV infection.
There is nowhere.
However, such a reversal is under way in Uganda, where the government's message is the same as the Catholic Church's: "Change Your Behaviour".
Huge numbers of condoms have been distributed in Botswana, and the result has been for President Festus Mogae to declare, "Abstain or die".
Who, exactly, is incapable of fidelity within a monogamous marriage and abstinence outside such a marriage? Women? Black people? Poor people? Developing-world people? Or just poor black women in the developing world?
There are the closest ties between my native Saint Helena and Cape Town, the gateway to and from AIDS-ravaged South Africa. Sailors, young single people, all the stereotypes.
Yet Saint Helena (where, by the way, there are almost no Catholics, but very strong traditional family structures and so on) is one of extremely few territories in the world never to have had a case of HIV infection. Not one. Ever.
So yes, it can be done. It is being done.
There is probably no greater force on earth for spreading HIV infection than the condomaniacal Department for International Development, for all the other good that DfID does.
But change is coming. Until a few weeks ago, the Shadow Secretary of State was a highly committed Catholic. A Shadow Minister there is still the only Pentecostal pastor in Parliament.
Jim Murphy may be gone. In any case, he might not last long, due to his somewhat uncompromising Blairism. But bring up the Blue Labour-connected, Ed Milband-nominating Gavin Shuker.
Evangelical churches are on the rise as local voting blocs that Labour needs to mobilise. That is not news to longstanding readers of this site.
The remarkable manner in which the unexpected selection of Gavin Shuker as the Labour candidate at Luton South led to the unexpected Labour retention of that seat, both due to the activities of his congregants, ought to attract the attention of Martin Bell.
Although it is now hardly remembered, Bell sought in 2001 to unseat Eric Pickles at Brentwood and Ongar, which latter Bell could not pronounce correctly, due to the "infiltration" of the local Conservative Association by a Pentecostal church.
Pickles had never been a member of the Peniel Pentecostal Church in Pilgrims Hatch.
Whereas until his election at the age of 28, Shuker was the pastor of the City Life Church in Luton, and another member of it now chairs his Constituency Labour Party in place of a party machine stalwart who had not wanted him as the candidate.
Whereas until his election at the age of 28, Shuker was the pastor of the City Life Church in Luton, and another member of it now chairs his Constituency Labour Party in place of a party machine stalwart who had not wanted him as the candidate.
All to the good, say I.
Of course a figure like that (who is white, if it matters, as I expect are most or all of the members of his church) is Labour, and is already a Shadow Minister, for the sake of retaining whom and others variously Evangelical and Catholic on the front bench no whip was imposed on the definition of marriage.
Such is their clout within Ed Miliband's Labour Party, however modest their numbers may be.
Of course a figure like that (who is white, if it matters, as I expect are most or all of the members of his church) is Labour, and is already a Shadow Minister, for the sake of retaining whom and others variously Evangelical and Catholic on the front bench no whip was imposed on the definition of marriage.
Such is their clout within Ed Miliband's Labour Party, however modest their numbers may be.
None of this is remotely surprising to anyone who knows which way the wind blows. It is anything else that would be flabbergasting.
Shuker and I have mutual friends, and I strongly suggest that you do not take your eye off him.
Shuker and I have mutual friends, and I strongly suggest that you do not take your eye off him.
But where does it all leave Martin Bell, himself originally from the East of England, where the two Luton seats are Labour's only remaining redoubts in this Parliament, with one of them having been held by these means?
Bell is getting on a bit. But his nephew, who wrote his totally cynical election address at Tatton in 1997, is still only 50 or 51. I refer to Oliver Kamm.
To Kamm's mind, the situation at Luton South, and the influence of figures such as Gavin Shuker within the Labour Party, must be utterly egregious.
The idea of the erstwhile pastor of the City Life Church as an International Development Minister must be as horrific to Kamm as it is exciting to me.
The idea of the erstwhile pastor of the City Life Church as an International Development Minister must be as horrific to Kamm as it is exciting to me.
If Oliver Kamm does not announce his candidacy at Luton South, then there will be no remaining reason to take with even so much as the slightest seriousness anything that he might ever say on any subject whatever.
The Catholic Church is however guilty of saying egregiously stupid things such as describing non-existent "holes" in condoms through which AIDS may pass.
ReplyDeleteIt is obviously right on the main issue but has muddied the waters by making scientifically illiterate remarks like that.
As for Gavin Shuker, he's obviously an idiot. Or he's never read the 2010 Equality Act, for a start.
It makes it impossible to hold conventional Christian views and work in most parts of the public pr private sector.
So what's he doing in the party that legislated for it and closed every Catholic adoption agency in Britain?
Bless.
Delete