Craig Murray writes:
The Conservative show of dashing home to look after the
British steel industry is just smoke and mirrors.
Savid Javid was fully aware it was being collapsed by subsidised and dumped Chinese imports, but argued that this cheap Chinese steel was beneficial to the UK economy more generally.
Savid Javid was fully aware it was being collapsed by subsidised and dumped Chinese imports, but argued that this cheap Chinese steel was beneficial to the UK economy more generally.
Arguing against higher EU tariffs on Chinese steel dumping, Javid stated to MPs only six weeks ago:
“The responsibility of government is to look at the
overall impact on British industry and jobs,” the Business Secretary said.
“If duties get disproportionate it would have an impact
in Britain and elsewhere on consumers of steel. Those businesses tell us it
will cost jobs and exports if duties got out of control…
“To go further might in the short term look the right way
to go to protect industry but you have to remember in Britain there are also
companies that consume steel as part of the production process.”
This is pure Thatcherism.
On Javid’s instruction, last
year the British diplomatic mission to the EU (UKREP Brussels) was lobbying the
EU commission against higher punitive tariffs on Chinese steel than the 13% the
UK supported – even though the Commission found that dumped Chinese steel had
an effective state subsidy of up to 72%.
I have this from a British diplomatic
source.
So the apparent flurry of activity now is a blind. This
is a situation the government was quite happy to see develop.
Of course, the
effects are in Wales, Scotland and Northern England. There are no steel mills
in Tory constituencies.
The banks received state subsidies to the value of
£35,000 from every man, woman and child in the UK.
Yet it is unquestionable
dogma that not even 0.1% of that can be given to aid manufacturing industry. I
can think of no legitimate explanation of this duality.
No comments:
Post a Comment