In the only newspaper that will print the view of 70 to 80 per cent of the electorate, Neil Clark sets out that view:
2013was the year which saw the death
of Margaret Thatcher, the politician who first unleashed privatisation on
Britain on coming to power in 1979.
It was also the year when Thatcher's disciples in the Westminster coalition sold off national assets and services that even the Iron Lady ruled out privatising - showing just how far down the neoliberal road we have travelled.
It was also the year when Thatcher's disciples in the Westminster coalition sold off national assets and services that even the Iron Lady ruled out privatising - showing just how far down the neoliberal road we have travelled.
In March, just as the RAF search and rescue
service was being praised for the heroic work it had done to help people
marooned or caught out in heavy snow in north Wales, the coalition announced
that the very same search and rescue service was being privatised.
A 10-year contract worth £1.6 billion was awarded to the US firm Bristow to run the services which for over half a century had been carried out brilliantly by the RAF and Royal Navy.
A 10-year contract worth £1.6 billion was awarded to the US firm Bristow to run the services which for over half a century had been carried out brilliantly by the RAF and Royal Navy.
Those phoney neoliberal "patriots" who
like to wrap themselves up in the Union Jack at any photo opportunity were
silent as our search and rescue operations were handed over to a Texas-based
company.
We were told that the Duke of Cambridge, who has worked as a search and rescue pilot, had "privately lobbied" David Cameron not to privatise the service but that he was rebuffed. The serial privatisers don't just ignore the British public but also, it seems, members of the royal family too.
We were told that the Duke of Cambridge, who has worked as a search and rescue pilot, had "privately lobbied" David Cameron not to privatise the service but that he was rebuffed. The serial privatisers don't just ignore the British public but also, it seems, members of the royal family too.
In July the government sold the state-owned NHS
blood plasma supplier to a US private equity firm co-founded by the neocon
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, giving a whole new meaning to
the phrase "vampire capitalism."
"Is there no limit to what and how this
coalition government will privatise?" asked Lord (Dr David) Owen, the
former foreign secretary. The good doctor clearly hadn't been following
closely what the privatisation-crazy coalition had been doing since coming to
power in 2010.
In October, Royal Mail, in public ownership since
its inception in 1516, was sold off, despite widespread public opposition. If selling off the national postal service was
bad enough, the price it was sold for was quite simply scandalous.
The government valued the business at just
£3.3bn, yet the shares jumped 38 per cent on the first day of trading, and this
week were trading around 561p - 70 per cent higher than their original price,
showing once again that the British taxpayer had been massively short-changed
by privatisation.
As for Business Secretary Vince Cable's promise
that only "responsible, long-term institutional investors" would be
allowed to buy Royal Mail shares - it was revealed a few days after the sale
that Lansdowne Partners, one of the world's biggest hedge funds and whose
co-head of development markets strategy Peter Davies was the best man at
Chancellor George Osborne's wedding, had bought up a £50 million stake in the
company.
Meanwhile, the gradual privatisation of the NHS
and its services continued. There are now over 350 GP services run by Virgin
Care and over 100 companies have been licensed to provide NHS community
services.
The government knew that it'd never be able to get away with privatising the NHS is one go, but its Health and Social Care Act, which came into force in April 2013, is all about destroying the service bit by bit.
The government knew that it'd never be able to get away with privatising the NHS is one go, but its Health and Social Care Act, which came into force in April 2013, is all about destroying the service bit by bit.
In 2014 there will no let-up in the coalition's
drive to "shrink the state" and privatise those assets and
services which remain in public ownership.
Before Christmas, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander announced that he had doubled the coalition's target for the sale of state assets to £20bn over the next six years.
Before Christmas, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander announced that he had doubled the coalition's target for the sale of state assets to £20bn over the next six years.
Earlier this week the government announced its
new "right to contest" scheme, which will allow "communities and
businesses" to submit a proposal for any of Britain's £330bn-worth of land
and property which remains in public ownership.
In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, Mark
Russell, the man in charge of state-owned businesses, discussed what was likely
to be sold this year.
There's the student loan book, which is likely to be sold in "tranches." There's Urenco, the nuclear fuel group co-owned by the governments of Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. There's also the sale of between £2.5bn to £3bn-worth of illiquid assets from the Royal Mail pension fund.
There's the student loan book, which is likely to be sold in "tranches." There's Urenco, the nuclear fuel group co-owned by the governments of Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. There's also the sale of between £2.5bn to £3bn-worth of illiquid assets from the Royal Mail pension fund.
Also earmarked for sale in 2014 is the East Coast
Mainline, Britain's most efficient rail franchise. The line paid more back to the taxpayer than any
other previous franchisee in the period 2009-12, and last year customer
satisfaction with the service reached a record high of 92 per cent. Yet the
coalition is still hell-bent on privatising it this year.
We can't have the British state owning our
railways, but our neoliberal elite are more than happy to have state-owned
companies from other European countries running railway franchises in Britain -
65 per cent of our rail franchises are now operated by foreign state-owned
companies.
And that figure could get bigger in 2014 as among the bidders for the East Coast line are Eurostar and Keolis, both majority-owned by the French state railway company SNCF.
And that figure could get bigger in 2014 as among the bidders for the East Coast line are Eurostar and Keolis, both majority-owned by the French state railway company SNCF.
The British government has already said that it
is selling its profitable 40 per cent stake in Eurostar. Other publicly owned businesses in danger include
the Ordnance Survey, the national mapping agency, the Met Office and the Royal
Mint.
For public ownership campaigners, the big problem
is that even though privatisation has never been more unpopular, our three main
parties are still, to a greater or lesser extent, wedded to the flawed
neoliberal model.
The Conservative Party, which supported a mixed
economy for a large part of the postwar period, is dominated by
uber-Thatcherites. The Liberal Democrats, who pledged to
renationalise the railways in 2005, are now run by "Orange Book" Lib
Dems, who have broken with the party's long-standing support for social
democracy.
Labour too, despite edging away from Blairism
since 2007, is still a long way from the position on public ownership adopted
by the party from 1945 until the 1990s.
On the railways, the Labour leadership, despite conference resolutions and the views of its members, has failed to give a commitment to renationalise. It hasn't ruled it out - but it hasn't ruled it in either.
On the railways, the Labour leadership, despite conference resolutions and the views of its members, has failed to give a commitment to renationalise. It hasn't ruled it out - but it hasn't ruled it in either.
Supporters of public ownership who believe that
the return of a Labour government will automatically mark the end of the
privatisation era are likely to be cruelly disappointed, unless enough popular
pressure can be put on the front bench of the party to change course.
The financial crash of 2008 should have marked
the end of the neoliberal era, but it didn't. Instead neoliberals have used
"austerity" as an excuse to embark on a new wave of privatisations.
Thatcher may be dead, but in 2014 Thatcherism
continues, in a new and even more extreme form. Despite public opinion being against them and the
arguments for privatisation being more discredited than ever, the serial
privatisers march on.
But we should not allow ourselves to become
demoralised. We have all the arguments on our side as well as
the support of the vast majority of the public. It's true that 2013 was a year of
disappointments, but that should only make us redouble our efforts in 2014 to
bring the privatisation era to an end.
The only way we will get change at Westminster is
if we make it clear that we will not support or vote for any politicians or political
parties which do not support public ownership and a return to the mixed economy
model which served Britain so well during the period 1945-79.
If you don't like privatisation, then don't vote
for it. It really is as simple as that.
Anyone who cares about nationalising utilities (and re- opening coal fired power stations )must call for EU withdrawal.
ReplyDeleteAny party that doesn't call for withdrawal from the EU cannot and will not renationalise anything-from our railways to our coal power stations and our hospitals.
That is not true, but it is good to see you agreeing that formations such as No2EU and the SLP deserve the coverage that is instead lavished on UKIP.
ReplyDeletePerhaps when UKIP loses the Wythenshawe and Sale East by-election? Perhaps when it fails to top the poll at the Euros? But I doubt it. The media are besotted.
Far more people vote for UKIP than for them-so it deserves more coverage.
ReplyDeleteWhen did No2EU last consistently out-poll the Lib Dems-or come second in the euros, as UKIP did last time?
Don't be so silly.
That was because of the wall-to-wall coverage. The media, especially the BBC, engineered that showing. They have still never managed to engineer a seat, though. Not for want of trying.
ReplyDelete