"December 25 is an historical date,"
Professor Tommaso Federici, Professor at the Pontifical Urbanian University and
a consultant to two Vatican Congregations, has stressed.
In an article in the Osservatore Romano on December 24, he wrote: "December 25 is explained as the 'Christianization' of a pagan feast, 'birth of the Sol Invictus'; or as the symmetrical balance, an aesthetic balance between the winter solstice (Dec. 21-22) and the spring equinox (March 23-24).
In an article in the Osservatore Romano on December 24, he wrote: "December 25 is explained as the 'Christianization' of a pagan feast, 'birth of the Sol Invictus'; or as the symmetrical balance, an aesthetic balance between the winter solstice (Dec. 21-22) and the spring equinox (March 23-24).
But a discovery of recent years has shed definitive
light on the date of the Lord's birth. As long ago as 1958, the Israeli scholar
Shemaryahu Talmon published an in-depth study on the calendar of the Qumran
sect [Ed. based , in part, on Parchment Number 321 -- 4 Q 321 -- of the
Qumran Dead Sea Scrolls, see picture at left], and he reconstructed without the
shadow of doubt the order of the sacerdotal rota system for the temple of
Jerusalem (1 Paralipomenon/Chronicles 24, 7-18) in New Testament times.
Here the family of Abijah, of which Zechariah (Zachary) was a descendant, father of John the herald and forerunner (Luke 1, 5), was required to officiate twice a year, on the days 8-14 of the third month, and on the days 24-30 of the eighth month.
Here the family of Abijah, of which Zechariah (Zachary) was a descendant, father of John the herald and forerunner (Luke 1, 5), was required to officiate twice a year, on the days 8-14 of the third month, and on the days 24-30 of the eighth month.
This latter period fell at about the end of September. It is not
without reason that the Byzantine calendar celebrated 'John's conception' on
September 23 and his birth nine months later, on June 24. The 'six months'
after the Annunciation established as a liturgical feast on March 25, comes
three months before the forerunner's birth, prelude to the nine months in
December: December 25 is a date of history."
In other words, according to the evidence of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Sacred Scripture, our liturgical calendar is accurate:
end of September
|
Zachary (Zechariah) "executed his priestly
function" (Luke 1:8) according to his class. His wife, Elizabeth,
conceived (the Church traditionally holds St. John's conception to have taken
place on 23 September) just as St. Gabriel said (Luke 1:24) and hid herself
away for 5 months.
|
25 March, the Feast of the Annunciation
|
In the sixth month of Elizabeth's pregnancy (Luke
1:26), St. Gabriel appears to Mary to tell her she is to have a child
|
24 June, the Feast of St. John the Baptist
|
Three months after the Annunciation,
St. John the Baptist was born, at a time when the days were becoming shorter |
25 December
|
Nine months after the Annunciation, Jesus was
born, at a time when the days were becoming longer.
|
In addition to this, the ancient "integral
age" tradition is that the Prophets died on the same day they were
conceived. With Passover set at 25 March, the Annunciation would have taken
place on that same date -- and the Nativity would've taken place 9 months
later, on 25 December.
To rebut the idea that Jesus had to have been born (rather than conceived) in the Spring because the shepherds were in their fields, which wouldn't have been so in the Winter, there's this, from the Anglican scholar, Alfred Edersheim, in his "The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah":
To rebut the idea that Jesus had to have been born (rather than conceived) in the Spring because the shepherds were in their fields, which wouldn't have been so in the Winter, there's this, from the Anglican scholar, Alfred Edersheim, in his "The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah":
And yet
Jewish tradition may here prove both illustrative and helpful. That the Messiah
was to be born in Bethlehem, was a settled conviction. Equally so, was the
belief , that He was to be revealed from Migdal Eder, 'the tower of the flock.'
This Migdal Eder was not the watchtower for the ordinary flocks which pastured
on the barren sheepground beyond Bethlehem, but lay close to the town, on the
road to Jerusalem.
A passage in the Mishnah [951] leads to the conclusion, that
the flocks, which pastured there, were destined for Temple-sacrifices [952],
and, accordingly, that the shepherds, who watched over them, were not ordinary
shepherds.
The latter were under the ban of Rabbinism, on account of their
necessary isolation from religious ordinances, and their manner of life, which
rendered strict legal observance unlikely, if not absolutely impossible.
The
same Mishnaic passage also leads us to infer, that these flocks lay out all
the year round, since they are spoken of as in the fields thirty days
before the Passover -- that is, in the month of February, when in Palestine the
average rainfall is nearly greatest.
Thus, Jewish tradition in some dim manner apprehended the first revelation of the Messiah from that Migdal Eder, where shepherds watched the Temple-flocks all the year round. Of the deep symbolic significance of such a coincidence, it is needless to speak.
It was, then, on that ‘wintry night’ of the 25th of December, that shepherds watched the flocks destined for sacrificial services, in the very place consecrated by tradition as that where the Messiah was to be first revealed.
Thus, Jewish tradition in some dim manner apprehended the first revelation of the Messiah from that Migdal Eder, where shepherds watched the Temple-flocks all the year round. Of the deep symbolic significance of such a coincidence, it is needless to speak.
It was, then, on that ‘wintry night’ of the 25th of December, that shepherds watched the flocks destined for sacrificial services, in the very place consecrated by tradition as that where the Messiah was to be first revealed.
Of
a sudden came the long-delayed, unthought-of announcement.
No comments:
Post a Comment