Neocons: Go On, I Dare You

There being a lot of repetition between this and some other posts today, the unique bits here are in bold:

To: mail@socialcohesion.co.uk, info@socialaffairsunit.org.uk, cllr.alan.mendoza@brent.gov.uk, mail@stephenpollard.net, oliver.kamm@thetimes.co.uk, melanie@melaniephillips.com, daniel.finkelstein@thetimes.co.uk, normblog@yahoo.co.uk, david.aaronovitch@thetimes.co.uk, gerald.baker@thetimes.co.uk, n.cohen@observer.co.uk, john.lloyd@ft.com, con.coughlin@telegraph.co.uk, j.hari@independent.co.uk

From the list of addressees to this email, you will have gathered that the correspondence that has been flying about over the last week or so has been brought to my attention.

In addition to copying this to the local press, I am also BCC-ing it to much of the national media. Let me make it clear that after reading the material in circulation to and among you, I will certainly be an Independent candidate here in North-West Durham at the General Election expected in spring 2010.

Your informants in this constituency are correct that Hilary Armstrong is retiring, and the all-women shortlist is creating enormous ill-feeling within the Constituency Labour Party, not least because there will be no local candidate on it (the CLP’s own fault, of course). They are also right about the sizeable body of Independent Councillors here, and about the extreme anger of those many Labour Councillors who have seen their seats abolished by the imposition of unitary local government against the wishes of the electorate.

It is also the case that an all-women shortlist means, of course, an Emily’s List candidate, who must be in favour of abortion entirely on demand, up to and including partial birth. This constituency has a very considerable Catholic population, which predominates in the largest town. Several Labour Councillors, particularly there, owe their seats to that vote. If they were so much as to sign the nomination papers of an Emily’s List candidate, then I honestly do not know who would ever again sign their own nomination papers, and they would certainly stand absolutely no chance of re-election.

Well, there is no real fun, or even real effort required, in beating some girl who can afford to make Liam Byrne’s coffee for no pay for several years after university in the hope of being given a safe seat in an unfair contest (an all-women shortlist) on the wholly false premise that she was some sort of rising star. The Tories dropped to third place here last time, with a candidate who looked about 12 and had not even bothered to acquire a non-London address for the duration. A party which exists purely in order to secure Cabinet seats for members of the Bullingdon Club has no conceivable appeal here.

And the Liberal Democrats are the Liberal Democrats, with a history of standing aside successfully for Independents at Tatton in 1997, and at Wyre Forest in 2001 and 2005. Never mind for an Independent who shared their local communitarian populism, their support for certain causes such as the opening up of the family courts and the call for a coroner’s inquest into the death of Dr David Kelly, their opposition to the neoconservative war agenda and to the erosion of civil liberties, and their enthusiasm for electoral reform. But not their European federalism, their soft line on crime and drugs, their hostility to traditional family values, or their desire to abolish church schools, none of which plays well in these parts.

But beating you, on the other hand, would not only relegate all three of those essentially defunct parties to bit-part players, but would also be real fun, even if it, too, would require no real effort. An Independent whose election address was largely gleaned word-for-word from my letters to the local free newspaper kept his deposit last time, and took more votes than the reduction in the Labour majority.

So, I dare you to do as you are being urged to do and undertake that you will put up someone against me. I say that there is a ninety per cent chance that you could not secure enough signatures to get onto the ballot paper, and I dare you to try and prove me wrong. I say that there is a ninety-five per cent chance that, even if you got onto the ballot paper, you would lose your deposit, and I dare you to try and prove me wrong. I say that there is a one hundred per cent chance that you would take fewer votes than I, and I dare you to try and prove me wrong.

Yes, as you have been told, I am an opponent of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, believe that the armed forces are required by their oath to defend this Realm to bring themselves home unilaterally in order to force both the Government and the Official Opposition to resign without a shot’s needing to be fired, and recognise those wars as the planned genocide of the white working class in Britain, and of African-Americans, Irish Catholics, and Scots-Irish Southerners and Westerners in the United States.

So I dare you to put up against me a candidate in favour of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, a candidate by definition unconcerned at the overwhelming predominance of the white working class among the British dead, and of African-Americans, Irish Catholics, and Scots-Irish Southerners and Westerners among the American dead. Go on. I dare you.

Yes, as you have been told, I am firmly of the view that Lebanon’s European official language, and requirement that the President be a Christian, make Lebanon is a more Western country than Israel. I am firmly of the view that Syria’s Christian-majority provinces, and Christian festivals as public holidays, make Syria is a more Western country than Israel. I am firmly of the view that Iran’s three reserved parliamentary seats for Christians (and one for a Jew) make Iran a more Western country than Israel.

So I dare you to put up against me a candidate a candidate who objects to the fact that one of the official languages of Lebanon is French and that the President has to be a Maronite Catholic. Who objects to the Christian-majority provinces of Syria, and to the Christian festivals as public holidays there. Who objects to the three reserved seats for Christians and one for a Jew in the Iranian Parliament. Go on. I dare you.

Yes, I have been known to point out the fact that Israel was set up by the ultimate globalist institution in surrender to exceptionally vicious anti-British terrorists of the Marxist variety. And yes, I want policy towards Israel and Palestine to pay close regard to the needs and aspirations of the Christian communities there, of which there are six that are particularly large.

So I dare you to put up against me a candidate who supports the dictation of our foreign policy by a country with Israel’s historical roots, and in which the balance of power is routinely held either by ultra-Orthodox parties (making Israel no more Western than Britain would be if the balance of power at Westminster were routinely held by parties in favour of the Caliphate, or Huindutva, or Khalistan) or, these days, by a party whose participation in government puts Israel in the same category as Austria was in when the FPÖ was in government there. And who objects to taking account of the needs and aspirations of the Christian communities in the Christian Holy Land. Go on. I dare you.

Yes, as you have been told, I am opposed to separatism in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Chechnya, Xinjiang, Tibet and Taiwan, while supporting the people of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in throwing off the shackles of the neoconservative, and massively corrupt, state into which they were only ever incorporated by Stalin. Yes, I would also support such throwing off by Transnsitria and by Nagorno-Karabakh. Yes, I am opposed to the erosion of civil liberties on wholly bogus grounds of “anti-terrorism”. And yes, I supported the exclusion of the Dutch MP Geert Wilders from this country, and want to extend this exclusion to the likes of the signatories to the Project for the New American Century and to the Patrons of the Henry Jackson Society, among other foreign preachers of hate.

So I dare you to put up against me a candidate who supports the banishment of the Serbo-Croat Santa from the schools of Sarajevo. Who supports the black-shirted Wahhabi heroin-traffickers of Kosovo. Who supports the dismemberment of Russia and China, including in the cause of the Caliphate. Who supports the admission of foreign preachers of hate to these shores. Who supports torture, very prolonged detention without charge (not trial, charge), the compulsory breathing licenses otherwise known as identity cards, and so forth. And who supports forcing people to remain within wholly foreign states, including forcing part of the first people ever to become Christian to remain within an Islamic state, into which they were incorporated by Stalin. Go on. I dare you.

I dare you to put up against me a candidate who is in favour of your own stated aim of a single European Union defence “capability” under overall American control. And who welcomed, as you did, the mercifully unsuccessful Presidential candidacy of Hillary Clinton, including her promise to launch a nuclear strike against the emerging democracy in Iran, with more women than men at university and with a reserved parliamentary seat for a Jew, if instructed to do so by her despotic, viciously misogynistic and fanatically Jew-hating financial backers in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. Go on. I dare you.

I dare you to put up against me a candidate who shares your enthusiasm for the genocidal Maoist overthrow of a government of daily communicants in Rwanda, and for the considerable worsening of the situation in Sudan by the inevitable expulsion of Western aid agencies in response to the probably illegal and certainly unenforceable indictment of that country’s President. And who is prepared to defend your own records as, variously, utterly unrepentant old Stalinists, utterly unrepentant old Trotskyists (a distinction without a difference), and utterly unrepentant old supporters of apartheid South Africa and Pinochet’s Chile. Go on. I dare you.

This constituency’s 21,312 Labour and 7869 Liberal Democrat voters should be aware that I am the candidate who wants to ensure that no one’s tax-free income falls below half national median earnings. To abolish prescription charges, and restore free eye and dental treatment. To make employment rights begin on day one of employment and apply regardless of the number of hours worked, as promised by John Smith.

To save council housing, and bring all council services back in house. To renationalise the utilities and the railways. To build a national network of public transport free at the point of use. And to remove all nuclear, radiological, chemical and biological weapons from British soil and waters.

This constituency’s 6463 Tory and 3865 Independent voters should be aware that I am the candidate who wants to restore the supremacy of British over EU law. To return to preventative policing based on foot patrols. To make each offence carry a minimum sentence of one third of its maximum sentence, or 15 years for life. To restore grammar schools, restore O-levels, restore excellent Secondary Modern schools, and defend and restore Special Needs Education.

To introduce a legal presumption of equal parenting, restore the tax allowance for fathers, and allow paternity leave to be taken at any time in the first 18 years of the child’s life. To help farmers and small businesses through a windfall tax on the supermarkets. To defend village services, save shooting and fishing, repeal the hunting ban, and make Gypsies and Travellers obey the same planning laws as the rest of us. And to preserve the historic regimental system, rebuild the Royal Navy, and save the Royal Air Force.

And they should all be aware that I am the candidate who wants nuclear power and clean coal technology. The restoration of British overall control of our defence capability. Ministers to have their pay docked if either spending or outcomes are lower in the North East than in Scotland or the South East. Immediate and unconditional withdrawal from Afghanistan and Iraq. Total opposition to lap-dancing clubs. And an MP’s office in Consett as well as in Crook.

The Independent vote, one third of the Tory vote, half the Liberal Democrat vote, and one third of the Labour vote add up to more than the remaining two thirds of Labour support. In short, this seat can be taken.

Taken by the pro-life, pro-family, pro-worker and anti-war voice of economically social democratic, morally and socially conservative British and Commonwealth patriots. Taken by the voice of One Nation politics, with an equal emphasis on the One and on the Nation. Taken by a conservationist, not an environmentalist.

Taken at the beginning of a movement untainted by the betrayal of Gaitskellism over Europe, by the betrayal of Christian Socialism over nuclear weapons, by the decadent social libertinism of Roy Jenkins, or by the comprehensive schools mania of Shirley Williams. And taken as the victory of those whose American equivalents flocked to President Obama’s economic populism (including economic patriotism) and foreign policy realism (including economic patriotism) while voting to reaffirm traditional marriage in Florida and California, while voting to abolish legal discrimination against working-class white men in Colorado, while voting against the deregulation of gambling in Ohio or Missouri, and while keeping the black and Catholic churches (especially) going from coast to coast.

We need a captain in each community, who will know where our vote is and who will get out that vote. We need to start organising now. Anyone interested, please contact davidaslindsay@hotmail.com. Remember, we only need to be the first past the post. But we need to get our act together without delay.

As do you, if you are going to stop us. Except, of course, that you won’t. You wouldn’t dare. Even Oliver Kamm, whose decision to vote Tory in 2005 and to write about it in The Times because his local Labour candidate was anti-war rules him out for ever from being a Labour candidate, regards the electorate as beneath him, and would never stoop to seeking its mandate. Even Douglas Murray, who wrote in The Spectator that he had voted Labour in the Ealing Southall by-election after a row with Baroness Warsi on Question Time, and who therefore need not trouble the Tories for a seat, regards the electorate as beneath him, and would never stoop to seeking its mandate, which was why he did not stand against David Davis. Go on. Prove me wrong. I dare you.