Adherence to the Triple Lock would still have left Britain with a lower pension than any comparable country.
But if an eight per cent increase in wages is "a statistical anomaly", then precisely what increase would not be, and why not?
Where, exactly, is the line beyond which the figure is "anomalous"? And why, exactly, is that line there, in particular?
This is why we need you in Parliament, asking questions like this.
ReplyDeleteThen let's get me there.
Delete